|
 |
The Socio-Economic Impact of
International Fur Farming
Contents
1. Where does fur come
from? 2.
Worldwide Fur Farming 3. World fur sector
figures (2002) 4. A brief history of fur
farming 5. From
farm to consumer 6. From farm to consumer
– a truly international trade 7. The economic
importance of the international fur farming sector 8. Regulation 9. Wild or farmed –
animal welfare is paramount 10. The Fur
Renaissance 11. FUR – FAST
FACTS 12.
Glossary of common fur-bearers referred to in this website 13. About IFTF
1. Where does fur come
from?
Fur is obtained from both farmed and wild
species of fur bearing animals. 85% of the world’s fur trade
originates from farmed species that have been domesticated.
The main farmed species are mink
(Mustela vison); silver fox (Vulpes vulpes); blue fox
(Alopex lagopus); sable (Martes zibellina); black
fitch/polecat (Mustela putorius) and white fitch/polecat
(Mustela eversmanni); finn raccoon (Nyctereutes
procyonoides); chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) and
nutria (Myocastor coypus).
Most of the world’s farmed fur is produced
in Europe, accounting for 70% of global mink production (EU = 64%)
and 63% of fox production (EU = 47%). North America and Russia/the
Baltic States account for 13% and 11% respectively of global mink
production, while Russia/the Baltic States and China account
respectively for 11% and 27% of fox production. Denmark and Finland
are the world’s largest producers and exporters of mink and fox
skins respectively. Mink and fox provide the fur industry with its
staple raw material.
The majority of wild species used by the
fur trade are not taken specifically for their fur, but as part of
wildlife management programmes. These are necessary for the
maintenance of biodiversity and healthy eco-systems, population and
disease control and the protection of public lands and private
property. The international fur trade does not handle any endangered
species and to this end supports the Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).
Many abundant wild fur species are used in
the trade, but those in most common use are: grey fox (Urocyon
cinereoargenteus and Pseudalopex griseus) and red fox
(Vulpes vulpes); nutria (Myocastor coypus)(mainly from
South and North America); North American beaver (Castor
canadensis); coyote (Canis latrans); marten (Martes
americana); mink (Mustela vison); raccoon (Procyon
lotor); musquash (Ondatra zibethica); Russian sable
(Martes zibellina); Russian and Chinese squirrel (Sciurus
vulgaris); ermine (Mustela erminea); kolinski (Mustela
sibirica); Chinese weasel (Mustela nivalis) and New
Zealand Opossum (Trichosurus vulpecula).
Skins from goats and a variety of sheep
also enter the fur trade, including the Karakul lamb (Ovis
aries) which is raised in Afghanistan, central Asian republics
of the former Soviet Union, and Namibia.
back to top
2. Worldwide Fur
Farming

back to top
3. World fur sector
figures (2002)
| |
Number of |
|
|
| |
 |
full time employees in EU part time
|
|
106,000 108,000
|
 |
| |
Number of |
|
|
| |
|
full time employees in North
America part time
|
|
101,000 154,000
|
 |
| |
Number of |
|
|
| |
|
full time employees in other
countries part time
|
|
895,000 658,000
|
 |
| |
Value of fur
sales in EU |
|
|
| |
|
1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002
|
|
US $4,119
million US $4,341 million US $4,652
million
|
 |
| |
Value of fur
sales in North America |
|
|
| |
|
1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002
|
|
US $1,315
million US $1,930 million US $1,780
million
|
 |
| |
Total fur sales
world-wide |
|
|
| |
|
1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002
|
|
US $9,143
million US $9,838 million US $10,905
million
|
 |
| |
Number of fur
sector enterprises (retailers,dressers, auction houses,
brokers, etc.) in |
|
|
| |
|
EU North
America Other
|
|
40,000 2,300 75,000
|
 |
| |
Number of fur
farms in |
|
|
| |
|
EU Member
States EU-applicant countries North
America Russia/Baltic states
|
|
6,000 500 1,135 150
|
 |
| |
Amount of animal
by-products fed yearly to fur animals in EU |
|
|
| |
|
poultry
processing fish and fish
processing slaughterhouse
|
|
220,000
tonnes 365,000 tonnes 62,000 tonnes
|
| |
Amount of animal
by-products fed yearly to fur animals in North America
|
|
200,000
tonnes
|
| |
|
|
|
back to top
4. A brief history of fur farming
Fur farming started in the USA in the 1860s
(“Nature’s Jewels – a history of mink farming in the United States”,
Bruce William Smith, 1981). However, the historical starting point
of modern fur farming is considered to be 1895 when three Canadians
started breeding silver foxes on Prince Edward Island.
Fox farming began in Europe when the first
pair of silver foxes were introduced to Norway in 1914. Production
grew rapidly and, by 1939, Norway was producing some 348,000 silver
foxes. Today, Finland is the world’s largest producer of foxes.
The first mink farms arrived in Scandinavia
in the 1920s. By the mid-1940s, mink production had assumed some
significance, especially in the USA. Shortly after the Second World
War, Europe became the most important mink producer, especially the
Nordic countries. Today Denmark is the largest mink producer.
Both scientists and governments agree that
after more than 100 generations, farmed fur animals are effectively
domesticated. In a statement to the Dutch Government in 1999, the
Danish Justice Ministry noted that “The farmed mink’s temperament,
for instance, has changed from being a nervous, agitated animal
fleeing to its nesting cage upon approach of human beings, to now
often reacting curious and examining.”
Farmed fur animals have adjusted well to
the modern farm environment. They breed successfully, in accordance
with the animals’ one-year natural lifecycle, are healthy, and
generally docile.
Mink kept on the farm can be considered as
domestic animals. It is “erroneous” to suggest mink are not
domesticated. The great inquisitiveness of farm mink and the
ease of handling these mink emphasise a clear form of
domestication.  Professor P R Wiepkema, Advice
regarding the husbandry of fur animals, May 1994, study for
Dutch government. |
back to top
5. From farm to consumer

back to top
6. From farm to consumer –
a truly international trade
| |
After a university degree in Art History and
a stint in advertising, the romance of fur brought me back to
work with my father in our family manufacturing business.
I love the range of experience my work brings: in a single
day I may be planning a new collection with our designer,
developing promotional campaigns or organising a marketing
trip to the USA or Europe.
Christina Nacos, fur
manufacturer, Canada |
| |
|
| |
1. Christina Nacos, fur
manufacturer, Canada 2. Fur Dressing/Dyeing |
 | |
The fur sector is complex and international
with the fur pelt produced by the farmer normally passing through
several countries and undergoing various processes before it reaches
the final consumer. Although fur is largely produced in countries
with cold climates, the end product is worn all over the world.
To produce a pelt, the farmer cannot work
alone. The farmer’s network includes links with, for example, feed
kitchens, specialised auction houses, veterinarians, and seasonal
workers.
Although some skins are sold privately or
through local collectors, the majority of farmed fur is sold through
auction. The world’s largest auction houses are in Copenhagen,
Helsinki, Oslo, Saint Petersburg, Seattle and Toronto. Buyers attend
from all over the world and bid for furs, which are traditionally
sold in graded and assorted bundles.
From the auction houses, collectors and
merchants, the pelts are consigned for dressing (cleaning,
softening, preserving and drying) and, in many cases, dyeing. The
pelts are then ready for grading into colour, size, length of hair
and texture. The main centres for these processes are in the Baltic
States, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy and Russia. The pelts
are then ready to be manufactured into a fur garment, incorporated
into a textile garment or used to make accessories.
Manufacturing
Manufacture of full fur garments,
combination fur garments and garments with fur trim takes place
worldwide. However, the most important manufacturing centres are in
Canada, China and Hong Kong, Greece and Russia. In addition, there
is still manufacturing in many other countries including France,
Germany, Italy, Korea, Japan, Spain, Turkey, the Ukraine and the
USA.
Manufacturing of fur is a highly qualified
profession, and many businesses are family-run, passing on
traditional skills from generation to generation. This tradition is
being carried on in newer markets where a wave of young people is
joining the trade and learning these skills, as well as the latest
technological developments.
In Canada, there are about 120
manufacturing companies, supported by 8 major dressers and dyers.
More than 85% of manufacturing production is in Montreal, the
remaining 15% is largely located in the Toronto region. Although all
types of fur are used, Canadian manufacturers are renowned for wild
fur garments. Beaver, especially sheared and worked in a range of
treatments, is the single most important Canadian fur garment
category. Approximately 90% of Canadian fur garment exports go to
the USA, the balance is sold in Europe, Russia and Asia (especially
Japan).
Over the past 50 years, Hong Kong has
established itself as one of the leading fur manufacturing centres
of the world, consuming almost 60% of global raw fur production
(mainly mink and fox).
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1
|
2
|
|
1. International Fur Trade Fair 2. Fur fashion
boutique | |
The Hong Kong fur industry remains largely
family-owned, but new entrepreneurs continue to enter the market,
adding a constant vitality to the wealth of existing experience.
Much of the manufacturing process is carried out in Hong Kong-owned
factories located in China, primarily in Guangdong Province in the
south but also in the north. The average Hong Kong fur manufacturer
employs between 200 and 500 workers; several have a workforce in
excess of 1,000.
Not only is Hong Kong’s pre-eminence partly
due to the parallel development of both dressing and manufacturing,
but Hong Kong has some of the largest dressing operations in the
world, each employing between 200 and 600 workers.
In recent years, Hong Kong furriers have
continuously improved their craftsmanship, while exploring new
techniques. Products now carry their own brand names and are
produced with different characteristics and styles to suit a wide
range of different markets. 95% of fur products made in Hong Kong
are exported all over the world, to countries including Italy,
Japan, Korea, Russia, Spain and the USA.
Greece is the main manufacturing centre in
Europe, with 4,000 Greek businesses involved in the fur trade. The
sector dominates the economies of two areas – Kastoria and Siatista
– where opportunities outside the fur trade are very limited.
Russia is divided into 89 territorial
regions. Every second region has a fur processing factory and each
region has small factories and workshops for making up fur garments.
The largest fur processing centres include Moscow and the
surrounding region, Tatarstan, Kirov, Saint-Petersburg, Novosibirsk,
Irkutsk, and the Stavropol region. There are some 20,000 large,
medium and small enterprises throughout the country engaged in
processing fur skins, producing ready-made garments and retailing.
Russia is the biggest producer and consumer of fur hats.
Trade Shows
Retailers from all over the world attend
trade shows held each year in Beijing, Frankfurt, Hong Kong,
Istanbul, Kastoria, Madrid, Milan, Montreal and Moscow. These shows
enable even a small local furrier or boutique to see the most
up-to-date fur fashions and to buy the latest trends for the coming
season.
Retail
Today, fur garments and accessories reach
the final consumer via a wide range of retail outlets: specialised
fur shops, department stores and fashion boutiques.
Sales of full fur and fur trim worldwide in
2002 were estimated at US $10,905 million. They have been increasing
since the mid-1990s due in large measure to product development –
eg. lighter furs, sheared furs, knitted furs and “combination”
garments (ie. fur combined with other materials) and the prominence
of fur in fashion today.
back to top
7. The economic importance
of the international fur farming sector
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
1. Sorting furs for auction 2. Fur auction 3.
Sorting fur for design 4. Working with
fur | |
Producing over 12 million mink skins, fur
farming was worth Euro 514 million to Danish farmers in 2002, making
it the country’s third largest agricultural export product after
bacon and cheese. In Finland, where over 2 million foxes were
produced in 2002, the annual value of fur production at Euro 250
million is greater than that of beef. Fur farming is also important
in the Netherlands where 3 million skins were produced in 2002, and
in some of the Central and Eastern European countries that have
applied for EU membership – Latvia, Poland, Lithuania and Estonia.
In Poland, the production figures for mink and fox skins in 2002
were 600,000 and 260,000 respectively.
In Canada and the United States, there are
some 1135 fur farms producing mainly mink, but also some fox and
chinchilla. In Canada, approximately 1.5 million mink pelts are
produced by fur farms annually. In the United States, some 330 mink
farms across 28 states produce around 2.6 million pelts annually –
worth around US$86 million. The majority of American mink farms are
family-run, depending exclusively on fur farming for their
livelihood, with everyone from the grandparents to grandchildren
providing the labour.
In South America, both mink and chinchilla
continue to be farmed in Argentina, producing approximately 10,000
mink and 27,000 chinchilla skins per annum.
It is estimated that China produces over 1
million mink and fox skins respectively, while the production in
Russia in 2002 was 2.7 million mink and about 400,000 fox skins.
Russian fur farming is concentrated in the regions of Kaliningrad,
Moscow, Leningrad, Tver, Smolensk regions, Stavropol Territory, and
the Republics of Kabardino-Balkaria, Tatarstan and Siberia.
Revenue from fur farming allows many
farmers, particularly in Europe, to supplement income from other
agricultural activities. Fur farming also allows farming to remain
economically viable in rural areas where climatic conditions limit
the production options available. In Finland, an estimated 50% of
fur farmers rely exclusively on fur farming for their incomes. Even
where climatic limitations are not an issue, other factors can limit
the alternative possibilities open to farmers, eg. quotas for
products such as beef, milk or environmental and planning
restrictions.
Fur farming provides an efficient use for
animal by-products that are purchased from fish and poultry
processors. In the EU, fur animals consume on an annual basis
220,000 tonnes of by-products from poultry processing, 62,000 tonnes
of slaughterhouse by-products and 365,000 tonnes of fish and fish
processing by-products. In North America, 200,000 tonnes of animal
by-products are fed each year to fur farmed animals. The consumption
by fur animals of these by-products not intended for human use helps
to keep down the actual cost of human food production.
Fur farmers respect the importance of
maintaining a clean environment. The small amount of manure that is
produced is disposed of in a responsible way. Manure makes a good
organic fertilizer for other agricultural sectors, while mink fat
can be recycled as an important ingredient in hypoallergenic soaps
and hair products.
back to top
8. Regulation
Fur farming is well-regulated under
international, national or regional laws and guidelines.
The EU Directive 98/58 on the welfare of
farm animals specifically includes fur farming. Directive 93/119
deals with permitted killing methods for individual species
(including fur farmed animals). Additionally, fur farming is covered
by the common market organisation established by Regulation 827/68.
European fur farmers abide by a European Code of Practice, which
incorporates the revised Recommendation on the keeping of fur
animals adopted by the Council of Europe in 1999. The Recommendation
is legally binding in Germany, has been incorporated into national
law in Finland and Norway and is expected to be national law in
Denmark shortly. In addition, fur farming is covered by the same EU
environmental laws that apply to all EU agricultural sectors.
In Russia, fur farming has a long tradition
and is an important agricultural sector. It is covered by
agricultural and company legislation. In addition, there are two
specific laws covering fur farming: the law on protection of
selection achievements, which covers both plant varieties and animal
breeds, and the law on pedigree husbandry. There is also legislation
governing technologies used for fur animal breeding and individual
genotype assessment.
North American fur farmers operate under
State and Provincial laws and Codes of Practice covering animal
welfare, developed with veterinarians, scientists, government
officials and farmers. In the United States, farming standards are
guided by those of the American Veterinary Medical Association
(AVMA). In addition, fur farmers operate under federal environmental
standards, such as the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, and
federal labour legislation. In Canada, the Recommended Code of
Practice for the Care & Handling of Mink was developed under the
auspices of Agriculture Canada and in conjunction with the Canadian
Federation of Humane Societies.
In Argentina, fur farmers operate under
government legislation (Resolution 495), with annual inspections of
farms carried out by the Fauna and Agriculture Ministry.
Many producer countries have national
authority or self-regulated industry inspection and reporting
schemes, involving veterinary or other official scrutiny. For
example, in Norway, a scheme is in place that involves 30 inspection
groups who travel round the country visiting fur farmers. A
veterinarian is assigned to each group. Conditions on farms are
thoroughly checked and advice on improvements given when required. A
similar self-supervision scheme operates in Finland, while in
Denmark all farms are controlled every second year by the local
department responsible for the environment.
In the Nordic countries, the veterinarians
also inspect farms with particular regard to the use of medicines
and vaccines. At a European level, a monitoring programme has been
introduced by the European Fur Breeders’ Association and
International Fur Trade Federation. Launched in 1999, fur farms in
Germany, Ireland, Italy and Spain have been checked and advised on
the requirements of the Council of Europe.
In the United States, a Merit Award
programme has been introduced by the fur trade in consultation with
veterinarians, animal scientists, wildlife biologists and farmers.
The Award covers standards for the humane production of fur bearing
animals and is achieved only after an independent inspection of the
farm. It is one of the first formalised humane care certification
programmes in US agriculture and recognises:
 | Vigilant attention to nutritional needs
 | Clean, safe and appropriate housing
 | Prompt veterinary care
 | Consideration for the animals’ disposition and reproductive
needs
 | Elimination of outside stress |
| | | |
Nearly 95% of US mink production comes from
farms certified under the Merit Award programme.
In addition, US farmers are kept up-to-date
on the latest welfare, nutrition and breeding research findings
through the circulation of newsletters and summer schools
co-sponsored by the fur sector.
back to top
9. Wild or farmed – animal
welfare is paramount
| |
|
|
| |
|
1
|
2
|
|
1. Fur farming research 2. Veterinary
care | |
The welfare of wild or farmed fur species
is of paramount interest to the fur sector.
For over twenty years, the International
Fur Trade Federation has been a major supporter of research into the
most humane methods of taking wild fur-bearers, in close
co-operation with producer governments. This work has contributed
not only to improved trapping methods but has added to the knowledge
of furbearers and their habitats.
The IFTF has also lent its support to
on-going research on the welfare of farmed fur animals to ensure the
highest standards of care on farms. In 1999, the spending by
government and fur sector contributors on fur farming research in
four of the main producing countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and
The Netherlands) exceeded Euro 1,600,000.
Since 1999, the European Fur Breeders’
Association and the International Fur Trade Federation have been
supporting the work of the Fur Animal Welfare Research Committee
(FAWRC), an independent committee which reports to the Council of
Europe. Four projects have been exploring whether farmed mink need
swimming water and the potential effect of swimming water on animal
welfare. Three projects are looking into behavioural and welfare
aspects of farmed foxes.
In North America, the fur industry works
with suppliers of medicines and feedstuffs to fund disease and
nutritional research. In the United States, the industry has
supported university research programmes since the 1950s, through
the Mink Farmers Research Foundation and now its successor, the
Research Committee of Fur Commission USA. In Canada, research
initiated by Canada Mink Breeders Association has resulted in the
development of vaccines to protect mink from disease as well as a
test for Aleutian disease.
Since the late 1930s, independent research
has been ongoing in Russia on farmed mink and foxes. This work has
largely focused on the domestication process in farmed fur
animals.
Results from the various research
programmes have in many instances been incorporated into law and/or
farm practices to benefit farmed fur animals in areas such as:
 | housing (eg. the introduction of nest boxes for mink and
observation platforms for foxes)
 | disease prevention (eg. Aleutian disease)
 | breeding and selection (eg. selection for more confident
animals)
 | husbandry (eg. promotion of early handling of kits)
 | nutrition (eg. composition, hygiene and control of feed) |
| | | |
There are two key reasons that fur farmers
attach such importance to supporting scientific research. First,
they want to ensure that farming systems continue to have a high
standard of animal welfare. Second, they want to ensure that any
rules or regulations governing the sector continue to be based on
sound scientific fact.
Finland has always been in favour of high
standards of animal welfare. All the scientific data which we
have shows that there is no difference in the well-being of
animals kept for farmed fur products compared to those kept
for other purposes. Mr Kimmo Sasi, Finnish Minister of
Trade, in a press statement in London –
10.2.00. |
back to top
10. The Fur
Renaissance
In the last five years fur has undergone a
renaissance in the fashion world, with in excess of 300 leading
international fashion designers working with fur in their
collections.
Fur is not confined to exclusive or
expensive clothing or to full fur garments, it is also used for trim
and accessories. It is versatile, light and comfortable to wear,
providing warmth in a wide range of temperatures from 60°F to well
below zero.
This popularity of fur among designers and
consumers has been greatly helped by product development: the
production of lighter furs, sheared furs, knitted furs. There has
also been a dramatic increase in “combination” garments (eg. coats
lined with fur, wool jackets worked with fur and textile garments
with fur trim) as well as a revival of the full fur garment with a
modern edge.
Demand for fur garments exists worldwide,
but the largest consuming markets are China, Germany, Italy, Korea,
Japan, Russia and many of the former Soviet Republics, Spain and the
USA.
To help inform consumers about the fur they
are buying, the International Fur Trade Federation changed its
constitution in August 2002 to require all members to introduce a
labelling system on all fur garments and products sold at retail, if
this does not already exist . The label must state the common name
for the species, in English and/or the local language. Use of the
scientific Latin name is strongly recommended.
“Fur is back. For good. Previously a
luxury, it’s everywhere this winter.” ELLE France, 2 December
2002
“What’s different this time is the market –
younger, more creative people are buying fur.” Financial Times,
United Kingdom, 16 November 2002
“They [designers] also combined fur with
other materials, like denim, corduroy and brocade. The new styles
have helped bring down the average age of a fur customer to 35, from
48 just two years ago.” Newsweek, 16 December 2002
“Fur… harks back to a bygone era where
things were made by hand, with care and individuality. That makes
them incredibly covetable in today’s over-manufactured,
mass-marketed world.” Female magazine, Singapore, November
2002 “
Fur is transforming itself from dark, heavy
pelts worn only in the winter into light, bright fabrics worn the
year round.” The Star, Malaysia, 9 February 2003
“Fur has made a noticeable comeback.
Designers are finding new ways to make fur wearable. Coats, jackets
and vests are sportier and there’s fur trim on children’s coats. And
fur is not just being worn in northern climates.” The Leader
Post, Canada, 25 February 2003
back to top
11. FUR – FAST FACTS
 |
•
|
Fur is an authentic, natural product, based on the
sustainable use of renewable resources.
|
 |
Fur Farming
 |
•
|
Is well regulated under international, national or
regional laws and guidelines.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Is an established, natural part of the agricultural
sector in many countries.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Provides high standards of care for animal health and
animal welfare.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Is a valuable link in the food and recycling
chain.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Provides an efficient use of 647,000 tonnes of animal
by-products each year from the fishing and meat industries in
the EU alone.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Provides manure for organic fertiliser.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Mink provides fat for hypoallergenic soaps and hair
products.
|
 |
Economics
 |
•
|
Over 1 million people are employed full-time in the
fur trade worldwide.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Fur sales worldwide totalled some US$ 11 billion in
2001/02.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Nearly 117,000 enterprises exist worldwide –
retailers, dressers, brokers, etc.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In Denmark, fur farming was worth Euro 514 million in
2002, the country’s third largest export after bacon and
cheese.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In Finland, the annual fur production value is Euro
250 million, greater than that of beef, with over 50% of fur
farmers relying on fur farming as their sole source of
income.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In Canada, the fur trade contributes Can$ 800 million
to the Canadian economy, employing over 75,000 Canadians in
total.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In USA, the value of the fur industry at retail level
was US$ 1.53 billion in 2001/2. There are more than 100
manufacturers of fur garments and nearly 1,400 retail outlets
of finished fur garments.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
Hong Kong is the world’s largest importer of farmed
fur skins and remains the leading exporter of fur garments to
the value of more than US$ 320 million annually.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In Russia, the value of the fur trade is over US$ 2.5
billion, contributing around 0.6% – 0.8% of the turnover of
all consumer goods.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In the UK, fur brokers are responsible for buying the
majority of the world’s fur traded at raw or wholesale level,
with a turnover of some US$ 750 million per annum.
|
 |
Animal Welfare and Conservation
 |
•
|
Over the last 20 years, the IFTF alone has contributed
more than US$ 5 million in support of a wide range of animal
welfare and conservation projects.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
The European fur sector and national governments spent
over Euro 1.6 million in 1999 on fur farming
research.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
European fur farmers helped to establish the Fur
Animal Welfare Research Committee (FAWRC) in 1999, which
reports to the Council of Europe’s Standing Committee on farm
animal welfare.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
The European Fur Breeders Association (EFBA) has its
own Code of Practice, which incorporates the Council of Europe
recommendations, with its own further “best
practice”.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
North American fur breeders have Codes of Practice
that include recommended methods of care from birth to death
of mink and foxes.
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
The IFTF is a voting member of the World Conservation
Union and supports the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species (CITES).
|
 |
Public Opinion
 |
•
|
In the USA, 86% of Americans support an individual’s
freedom to choose whether to wear fur. (1996)
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
69% of Finnish people have a positive attitude to fur
farming. (1998)
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In the UK, 62% of people consider that it is
environmentally sound to use natural fibres such as wool,
silk, fur and leather. (2000)
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
71% of Dutch people agree with the statement, “it
makes in principle no difference for what reason you keep
animals as long as you take care of their welfare”.
(2000)
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
67% of Dutch people believe individuals should have a
free choice to wear fur. (2000)
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
67% of Scottish people strongly agree with the
statement “in principle, I find it acceptable that animals are
kept on farms for any purpose, provided there is good animal
welfare.” (2001)
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
68% of Canadians know that the fur trade helps to
support the livelihoods and cultures of people living in close
harmony with the land. (2001)
|
 |
 |
 |
•
|
In Norway, two thirds of people support fur farming
(Sentio Norsk statistikk/Nationen). (2003)
|
 |
back to top
12. Glossary of common
fur-bearers referred to in this website
 |
Farmed species
Common name Chinchilla Finn
raccoon Black fitch/polecat White
fitch/polecat Silver fox Blue fox Mink Nutria
Sable
Karakul lamb |
 |
Scientific
name Chinchilla lanigera Nyctereutes
procyonoides Mustela putorius Mustela
eversmanni Vulpes vulpes Alopex
lagopus Mustela vison Myocastor
coypus Martes zibellina
Ovis
aries |
 |
Wild species
Common name N American/ Canadian
beaver Coyote Ermine N American grey fox S
American grey fox Red fox Kolinski N
American/ Canadian marten Mink Musquash
Australian/ New Zealand Opossum Nutria N
American/ Canadian Raccoon Sable Squirrel (from
Russia/China) Weasel
(alphabetical order)
|
 |
Scientific
name
Castor canadensis Canis
latrans Mustela erminea Urocyon
cinereoargenteus Pseudalopex griseus Vulpes
vulpes Mustela sibirica
Martes americana Mustela
vison Ondatra zibethica
Trichosurus vulpecula
Myocastor coypus
Procyon lotor Martes
zibellina Sciurus vulgaris Mustela
nivalis
|
 |
back
to top
13. About IFTF
First established in 1949, the
International Fur Trade Federation (IFTF) is a federation of 34
national fur trade associations and organisations from 28
countries.
Through its work and the activities of
members, IFTF seeks to protect fur trade interests and encourage a
factual image of today's fur trade.
IFTF is fully committed to maintaining high
standards of care, habitat, health and welfare for fur animals,
established under international, national and regional laws,
agreements and codes of practice.
The international fur trade does not handle
any endangered species and to this end supports the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).
For further information and updates, please
visit our websites at: http://www.iftf.com
back
to top |
 | |